<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Tutorial &#8211; Anchor Text Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-gold.com</link>
	<description>Professional SEO services for small business websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-31394</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-31394</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read in a few places that anchor text is weighted more than an image alt text. Does anyone have current testing that clearly shows this?  Logically IMO it makes sense as you could have an image of grapes, but your image alt text says bananas. The search engines would have a tough time programmatically knowing. So I&#039;d imagine they can&#039;t fully trust image alt.. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read in a few places that anchor text is weighted more than an image alt text. Does anyone have current testing that clearly shows this?  Logically IMO it makes sense as you could have an image of grapes, but your image alt text says bananas. The search engines would have a tough time programmatically knowing. So I&#8217;d imagine they can&#8217;t fully trust image alt.. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Training Online</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-31358</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Training Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-31358</guid>
		<description>Hello

When I read this article, it seems like you want that one shud not use Title/Alt tag. Is it?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>When I read this article, it seems like you want that one shud not use Title/Alt tag. Is it?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-28371</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-28371</guid>
		<description>So if I write an article and someone asks for anchor text, they actually want a word eg Home insurance highlighted/linked, that is the anchor text? The link will then be the long piece of html that they give me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I write an article and someone asks for anchor text, they actually want a word eg Home insurance highlighted/linked, that is the anchor text? The link will then be the long piece of html that they give me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-28115</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-28115</guid>
		<description>Great article - great test - very helpful.

Question: Does Google weigh the value of anchor text links differently than alt-attribute text links? Or in other words, is it better to link from inline text than from images with alt-text?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article &#8211; great test &#8211; very helpful.</p>
<p>Question: Does Google weigh the value of anchor text links differently than alt-attribute text links? Or in other words, is it better to link from inline text than from images with alt-text?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Keys - Real Estate SEO Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-27468</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Keys - Real Estate SEO Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-27468</guid>
		<description>Found this while researching and it clearly makes the case for ALT and TITLE attributes. I&#039;m sharing this page with our SEO students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this while researching and it clearly makes the case for ALT and TITLE attributes. I&#8217;m sharing this page with our SEO students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant flower</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-24303</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant flower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-24303</guid>
		<description>Anyway, it should be ignored by Google etc… since alt attribute text is only meant to be associated with images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, it should be ignored by Google etc… since alt attribute text is only meant to be associated with images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mamun</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-23851</link>
		<dc:creator>Mamun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 06:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-23851</guid>
		<description>As a new entry in SEO, I was searching SEO and it&#039;s associated issue like anchor text, and after found SEO Gold I got it clearly and really it&#039;s helpful. This site has brought different  anchor text affiliated issue, really very helpful. I loved it. 

Mamun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a new entry in SEO, I was searching SEO and it&#8217;s associated issue like anchor text, and after found SEO Gold I got it clearly and really it&#8217;s helpful. This site has brought different  anchor text affiliated issue, really very helpful. I loved it. </p>
<p>Mamun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler G.</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-22230</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-22230</guid>
		<description>Pardon, I meant &quot;the *site&#039;s own titles,&quot; not &#039;page&#039;s.&quot;

Tyler G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon, I meant &#8220;the *site&#8217;s own titles,&#8221; not &#8216;page&#8217;s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tyler G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler G.</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-22229</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-22229</guid>
		<description>Great article... definitely helpful for figuring out anchor text optimization. My only issue, which I&#039;ve come across a lot with SEO articles, is the use of the page&#039;s own titles exclusively for examples. This has a meta effect where SEO noobs like me get confused. E.g.: 

&quot;Quick SEO Tip – note above how we have linked out important phrases like Professional SEO Consultant Services and SEO Tutorial to their respective pages including a link to this page – anchor text.&quot; (I understand this, but I have to think very hard). 

For Beginners guides and tutorials I think it&#039;s beneficial to use totally non-SEO related examples. 

Thanks again! 

Tyler G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article&#8230; definitely helpful for figuring out anchor text optimization. My only issue, which I&#8217;ve come across a lot with SEO articles, is the use of the page&#8217;s own titles exclusively for examples. This has a meta effect where SEO noobs like me get confused. E.g.: </p>
<p>&#8220;Quick SEO Tip – note above how we have linked out important phrases like Professional SEO Consultant Services and SEO Tutorial to their respective pages including a link to this page – anchor text.&#8221; (I understand this, but I have to think very hard). </p>
<p>For Beginners guides and tutorials I think it&#8217;s beneficial to use totally non-SEO related examples. </p>
<p>Thanks again! </p>
<p>Tyler G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hasini</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/comment-page-1#comment-20853</link>
		<dc:creator>hasini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-gold.com/seo-tutorial/anchor-text-optimization/#comment-20853</guid>
		<description>hi

i read your article, but i m little bit confused that how many anchor text we will apply on one page. also pls suggest me that how it is useful to get high SERP.

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>i read your article, but i m little bit confused that how many anchor text we will apply on one page. also pls suggest me that how it is useful to get high SERP.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

